Archive for October, 2009

AZ Central – Flood of foreclosure resales overshadow data

by J. Craig Anderson – Oct. 11, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Home-foreclosure activity has spilled across every geographic and socioeconomic border this year, proving that no community was too cautious, clever or well-funded to remain unscathed.

Subprime lending gave the home-foreclosure crisis its initial push, but the problem could not have reached existing proportions without feeding on a host of broader economic problems, according to real-estate experts responding to the latest Valley Home Values data, provided by Information Market.

“It has nothing to do with the value of the home,” said Mike Wasmann, president of the Arizona Association of Realtors. “It has to do with people not having any money.” The foreclosure rate has accelerated in more centrally located, often pricier neighborhoods while slowing down a bit in newer, more remote communities where the foreclosure floodgate burst in late 2007.

Job losses, salary cuts, unpaid work furloughs and failed investments were among the contributors to home foreclosures in communities with few first-time buyers and little subprime-lending activity, Valley real- estate analysts said.

They also pointed to home-equity loans as a major cause of foreclosures in older, more established neighborhoods, noting that many residents of those areas who face foreclosure today owed very little on their mortgages

before the appearance of equity emboldened them to borrow against the home’s value.

“A lot of people got hung out to dry on homes that they’ve had for a long time because they refinanced,” said Jay Butler, Arizona State University professor and realty studies director.

Role reversal

The ZIP code 85007 in central Phoenix, which houses more than its share of Arizona bluebloods and political insiders, was largely unaffected by area foreclosure activity in 2008, even as neighboring ZIP codes saw home values lopped in half.

But this year, the median home price in 85007 collapsed, falling 76.5 percent in the first eight months, according to analysis by The Arizona Republic using data from the Phoenix-based Information Market.

Median home-price comparisons only examine changes in value among homes that were bought and sold during the comparison period. They do not indicate the median value of all homes in the area.

Phoenix was the biggest overall home-value loser in 2009, with the city’s median home price dropping from $229,000 to $82,000 between September 2008 and Aug. 31.

A year earlier, Phoenix was among the best-performing Valley cities and towns, with a one-year median home-price drop of about 15 percent.

In contrast, Queen Creek experienced a much steeper decline of nearly 24 percent from September 2007 to August 2008. In the past 12 months, the decline has eased to slightly more than 9 percent.

Queen Creek homes have held more value than even the mansions of Paradise Valley, according to sales data. The Valley’s most expensive community posted its first double-digit, one-year drop in median sale price since before the housing boom.

However, Paradise Valley is still the breakaway winner in a survey of median-home prices in Maricopa County over the past five years. No other community could touch its five-year median price increase of more than 56 percent, from September 2004 to August 2009.

Outlying ZIP codes generally have seen home values begin to level, while price drops in more centrally located ZIP codes have gathered momentum.

Foreclosure activity also has shifted toward the urban center, Valley Home Values figures show.

For example, less than half of this year’s home-sales transactions in Queen Creek have involved foreclosures, while they have accounted for at least 60 percent of sales in most Phoenix residential areas.

Not every local housing market changed dramatically this year, according to the data.

Tempe and Scottsdale housing markets have enjoyed two consecutive years of relative stability, while El Mirage and Glendale have suffered relatively high foreclosure rates and sharp price declines two years in a row.

Local experts offered a variety of theories to explain the reversals, but they share a common theme: Foreclosures are becoming a bigger problem for the upper-middle class and even the previously wealthy.

One reason is loss of income, they said, especially among those households in which the primary source of wealth was real estate. But the threat of luxury-home foreclosure has not been limited to residents with stalled careers in home building and property sales, experts said.

Jumbo problem

In some respects, higher-priced neighborhoods have been playing catch-up with the less expensive areas, where rapid-fire foreclosures first began around late 2007.

Butler said the foreclosure wave appears to have run its course in starter-home communities such as Buckeye and Queen Creek.

“You sort of run out of things you can foreclose on,” he said.

It’s far less clear where the Valley is overall in terms of working through troubled “jumbo” mortgage loans, which are difficult to refinance because they are too large to secure a government guarantee of repayment. It’s likely foreclosures on more-expensive homes – those priced above the Federal Housing Administration limit of $346,000 – will take longer to purge from the housing market, in part because they will be much harder for lenders to sell.

Butler said he expects to see another post-holiday foreclosure surge in early 2010 that undoubtedly will include more high-end homes.

He pointed to the surge in foreclosures in February – about 4,300, a record at the time – as evidence that struggling homeowners had resolved to make it through the holiday season before ceasing payment.

Butler said many households have lost any financial cushion they might have once had, which means even the slightest financial setback could lead to foreclosure.

“Those that stretched their income to get the home, they’re in trouble,” he said.

Crystal Wright of Dallas-based auctioneer Hudson & Marshall said her company is handling far fewer properties for Phoenix-area lenders than it did a year ago, but the quality and condition of the homes it does handle are generally better.

Lately, banks are foreclosing on the sort of home that might belong to a doctor or a lawyer, Wright said.

“Now it’s prime mortgages that are involved,” she said.

www.theholmgroupaz.com

AZ Central – Worst may be over for housing market

by Catherine Reagor – Oct. 10, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Valley homeowners have watched their property values plummet with a sense of shock and horror during the past year. But the gut-wrenching drop could be over as early signs of the market finally hitting bottom have appeared in some areas.

On Sunday, The Arizona Republic’s latest Valley Home Values report will show prices dropped in every Phoenix-area ZIP code during the first eight months of 2009. A closer look at the numbers, though, reveals newer communities on the outer edges of metropolitan Phoenix are seeing smaller declines in home prices this year compared with 2008.

Those areas, including neighborhoods in Buckeye, Gilbert, Queen Creek and Surprise, were the first to experience the housing market’s collapse. Those former housing hot spots could be the first to recover.

Older areas closer to downtown Phoenix, including many central Phoenix neighborhoods, suffered the biggest home-price hits this year.

Most of these areas were the last parts of the Valley to see housing values tank, but they could bounce back more quickly because many of the neighborhoods are popular with people who want to live closer in.

Positive signs

And there are signs the Valley’s housing market has begun to inch toward a recovery.

Foreclosures have dropped during the past two months. Home sales are well ahead of last year’s pace. Home prices are slowly ticking up.

“Valley home prices hit bottom in April,” said Mike Orr, who publishes the “Cromford Report,” a daily analysis of metropolitan Phoenix’s home-sales data. “Foreclosures have peaked. The market is struggling to establish a clear direction.”

Orr said the Valley’s affordable-housing markets, especially those farther out, are seeing gains in home prices now.

But prices continue to fall in the most expensive neighborhoods.

The latest figures on foreclosure rates, home sales and home prices may be early indicators the housing market is starting to come back.

Foreclosures

Valley foreclosures fell 29 percent in September from the record 5,300 reached in July. Pre-foreclosures were also down last month, but there were still 7,857 homes that lenders started to foreclose on.

This is the key gauge of the health of metro Phoenix’s housing market.

As long as lenders continue to foreclose on Valley homes and resell them for half of what they sold for a few years ago, home prices will fall.

Check out the foreclosure-resale chart in Sunday’s Valley Home Values package to see how many foreclosure homes sold in your neighborhood this year.

Home sales

In June, Valley home sales buoyed by foreclosure-home resales rivaled monthly records set during the boom years. Although sales have slowed a little in the past few months, 85,000 homes have sold across metro Phoenix so far this year. That’s 50 percent ahead of last year’s pace.

There’s a positive indicator in the slight drop in recent home sales. Fewer of the sales are foreclosure homes.

Earlier this year, foreclosures homes accounted for almost 70 percent of all Valley home sales. Slightly less than half of the home sales in September were foreclosure homes.

Home prices

The median price of a Valley home has ticked up to $135,000 after falling to a 10-year low of about $120,000 six months ago.

The current median is half of what the record median high price for the market was in 2006, but it is heading in the right direction. Valley home prices started falling in mid-2007 but didn’t plummet until late in the year when lenders placed thousands of foreclosure homes on the market all at once and began accepting low-ball offers.

The supply of foreclosure homes for sale in the Valley has also fallen, another good sign for the market. There currently are about 4,500 foreclosure homes listed for sale, compared with more than 20,000 in February.

The federal government’s plan to push more lenders to restructure the mortgages of borrowers facing foreclosure could help ensure foreclosures don’t soar again.

A full recovery isn’t imminent, but the latest signs suggest the Valley’s housing market is beginning to pull out of its nose dive.

www.theholmgroupa.com

AZ Central – Some Valley residents benefiting from housing crisis

 

Oct. 11, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Some Valley residents actually benefited from the housing crisis. Here are some of their stories:

First-time owners take advantage of tax credit

Christina and Chad Haller said the First-Time Homebuyers Tax Credit motivated them to buy their first home sooner than they had planned. “We probably would’ve waited a year if it weren’t for the tax credit,” Christina said.

More than 38,000 Arizonans have taken advantage of the tax credit, which expires Nov. 31, according to the IRS. It covers 10 percent of the home’s purchase price, up to $8,000.

The Hallers closed on a 1,200-foot, three-bedroom, two-bathroom home in Gilbert in June. After spending about six weeks repainting most of the home and fixing up a few things, such as adding new stainless steel appliances to the kitchen, they moved in the first week of August.

“We saw a million houses, so I was just happy to finally find one that my husband and I were happy with,” said Christina Haller, whose home cost $132,500. “We really wanted to live in Tempe, but we were on a budget, and it was a cute house that we could afford.”

- Justin Doom

www.theholmgroupaz.com

AZ Central – Valley landlords face new reality

by Catherine Reagor – Oct. 11, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Renting out homes has long been a profitable enterprise for many Valley landlords.

The business model was simple: Buy a home. Rent the home for at least the monthly mortgage payment. And when you decide to sell the home, enjoy the Valley’s reliable appreciation in home prices.

That model fell apart amid the housing-market crash. Landlords, like everyone else, saw home values plunge. Rents fell. Many landlords who bought when prices were high now struggle to charge tenants enough to cover their mortgage payments. And this year, as foreclosures mounted, homes were snapped up by investors and turned into inexpensive rentals. Suddenly, the landlord business has changed. Competition for tenants is increasing as more homes become rentals. Apartment owners are lowering rents, offering free utilities or a month’s free rent, eliminating security deposits and credit checks.

This is the third in a periodic Republic series on how different segments of the housing industry are reinventing themselves to work toward a recovery. The new reality for Valley landlords is still taking shape. Longtime landlords slammed by the housing crash find they have to settle for less income, take more risks on tenants’ reliability and try to keep their properties out of foreclosure. New landlords see opportunity in the low housing prices.

There is no way to count the number of different types of landlords in the Valley. There are people who own a number of houses as their primary source of income. Other people buy one or two rentals to supplement their income and sell later for retirement or a college fund. Some landlords are local. Others are out-of-state investors. Some landlords manage their own properties. Others pay a fee and turn them over to property management firms.

What they all share now is a rapidly shifting landscape and no clear solution yet as to how to re-establish that simple business plan. And that may not be possible until the housing market in general stabilizes and the variables in making money through rentals also settle.

Those variables include how much to charge for rent to stay competitive, the costs of maintaining properties and the challenges in dealing with problem renters.

Competition

Among many things that have changed for landlords is the level of competition for reliable tenants.

Because of the economic downturn, more people are losing jobs and unable to always pay their rents. Record foreclosures and rising bankruptcies in the Valley also mean more renters with less-than- stellar credit records.

More foreclosures does mean more people who have lost homes turn to renting. But supply still exceeds demand as the number of new homes for rent and vacant apartments is still larger than the pool of tenants.

So landlords are lowering rents to attract tenants. At the same time, apartment owners are lowering rents, giving away flat-screen TVs, iPods, scooters or a month of free rent.

Rent rates used to be a function of covering mortgage payments for many landlords. More downward pressure on rents comes now from people who recently paid cash for inexpensive foreclosure homes and can ask for less in rents. With Valley home prices down 50 percent from 2007, longtime landlords are feeling the pinch.

Rents on Valley homes are now down 10 to 25 percent from last year, depending on the area, landlords say. The drop in rents means many longtime landlords can’t cover their mortgages anymore.

David Gudmundsen is offering new tenants $50 off their rent for six months in his 20 Valley rentals.

“The rental market really got tough, probably because apartments are giving away the farm to get tenants,” said Gudmundsen, a real-estate broker with S.J. Fowler/GMAC Real Estate. He purchased most of his rental properties during the past two years. Gudmundsen is a longtime Valley landlord who owned 80 rentals in metro Phoenix during the late 1990s but sold them before the market’s downturn in 2007. Homes with rents below $1,500 a month are now the most popular in the Valley.

“Just look at Craigslist or other online sites that list rentals. There’s a lot of Valley homes for rent priced below $1,500,” said Mike Sargent, a former executive with a high-tech firm who became a Valley landlord after the dot-com crash. “That’s what most people can afford now.”

Sargent recently dropped the rent on a Chandler home with a pool to $1,195. In 2002, the rent was $1,795.

“Everyone is dropping their rents now,” said Dean Wegner, a Valley mortgage broker and landlord, who is president of Arizona’s Independent Rental Owners Council. “It’s not only about getting tenants; it’s about keeping those who can pay.”

To keep a tenant, Wegner recently dropped the rent $100 on a north Phoenix home with a swimming pool to $850.

In the Valley’s current housing market, rental homes can sit empty for months. Cutting rents means lost income for landlords but perhaps less than losing several months of rent in a row.

“My business partner and I pay close attention to our renters, and we have been lucky,” said Phoenix City Councilman Tom Simplot, who owns five central Phoenix homes. “We lowered rents 20 percent this year because we want to keep our tenants.”

One place tenants can go if they choose to leave is sometimes to a nicer house down the street that was lost in foreclosure, purchased and turned into a rental for monthly payments well below recent mortgage payments. This is especially common in the newer neighborhoods that have been hard hit by foreclosures.

There’s no exact figure on how many Valley homes have been turned into rentals, because some buyers don’t disclose their intentions on property records.

As many as half of the 50,000 foreclosure homes to be sold by lenders in 2009 have been purchased by investors, according to property records and market watchers. Many investors are renting out the houses until home prices climb again and they can sell for a profit.

It’s a renters market now, and most landlords must drop prices to fill their homes, even if they lose money on the deals.

Maintenance

Another variable in the cost of doing business for a landlord is property maintenance and fixing damages caused by tenants.

Before the housing and economic crash, rental rates were rising with home prices. As rents drop, longtime landlords lose money on rents and lose the extra cash to maintain homes.

Landlords used to be able to charge tenants deposits equaling one or two months of rent, as well as non-returnable cleaning and maintenance deposits. But since the crash, many renters don’t have the extra cash for big deposits. And landlords have less leverage to ask.

The competition for tenants forces some landlords to drop required security deposits, which, combined with declining rents, makes it harder to cover regular wear and tear on a home or those unexpected expensive repairs. In some cases, landlords are even skipping credit and criminal background checks, which can lead to problem tenants.

“Landlords are lowering the bar on screening tenants and taking deposits,” said Margie O’Campo De Castillo, a Valley real-estate agent and landlord with two rental homes. “Homes are being wrecked, and landlords stuck with big cleanup fees. It’s hard to make money on rentals now.”

A friend of De Castillo has a Phoenix rental home that was recently vandalized by tenants. The friend will lose several months rent and spend thousands of dollars on repairs.

Michael Rhone lives in California and is a partner in seven Valley rental homes. He received a call from a Valley police department a few months ago about a possible meth lab in one of his rentals. “I had to fly in and deal with that. There wasn’t a meth lab, but tenants were involved in other illegal activities”

Rhone said the house is “trashed” and he’s thinking about letting it go into foreclosure instead of spending the money to fix it up because he’s already losing so much money and can’t sell for a profit now.

Just as some homeowners caught in foreclosure strip or vandalize their homes, the same thing can happen with tenants. According to Valley landlords, more renters are wrecking or stealing appliances and fixtures because they’re being evicted for not paying rent or because the home fell into foreclosure and they have to leave.

Sargent, who is co-owner of the property-management firm HomeLovers, said in today’s rental market, a landlord should have enough money to cover half a year of mortgage payments in case they can’t collect rents, have to fix homes or pay legal fees for evictions.

Despite the competitive pressures upon landlords, Sargent warns landlords to still be prudent. “Don’t forgo deposits just to attract a renter,” he said. “Renters must have some skin in the game now.”

Collecting rents

Before the economic downturn, fewer Valley residents were struggling to pay their bills. Now more renters, like homeowners, are falling behind on their bills each month.

So landlords sometimes have to find ways to keep a steady flow of payments coming in.

“I know not everyone has perfect credit and everyone makes mistakes, so I won’t do background checks,” said Elaine Balderas, who owns four south Phoenix rental homes. She drives by her properties every Sunday to check on them and usually collects rent on one of those trips.

“I can’t charge ridiculous deposits,” Balderas said. “But I want to see a recent pay stub, and I want them to look me in the eye and tell me they will pay.”

Julie Bieganski has had rental homes in the Valley for the past decade. She recently rented out a former foreclosure home in north Phoenix for $850 a month.

“You could get $900 a month in that area,” she said. “But the tenants are great, and their employer cuts me a direct check for the rent and it goes in my account as a direct deposit. This way I don’t have to chase around for the rent.”

When tenants stop paying rent, landlords have to decide whether to evict them and potentially go months without income or try to work out a deal hoping they’ll catch up on their monthly payments.

One of O’Campo de Castillo’s longtime renters recently lost his job and was going to move out.

“I told him, ‘Wait, we all are struggling now. Stay put. You need a home. Let’s give this a month or two,’ ” she said. “He is now paying his full rent again. It’s much better to lose some money for a few months than have the home empty or look for another good tenant in this market.”

More landlords are now faced with evicting tenants for not paying. It can be a costly legal process involving hiring a lawyer, filing court documents and paying to store anything they leave behind.

Rhone said three of his renters are behind on their payments. He is in the process of evicting one and is considering going through the legal process to have that tenant’s wages garnished to pay back rent.

When Gudmundsen had to evict a woman from one of his rental homes, she left almost all of her belongings. Under Arizona law, Gudmundsen had to give her more than a month’s notice to collect her belongings.

He had to pay to have them stored and pay for a public notice announcing they would be sold if she didn’t collect them.

To save money, Balderas skips formal eviction processes with her tenants, because she doesn’t have them sign leases.

Instead, Balderas has tenants sign an agreement stating when rent is due, and if they don’t pay, they have a month to vacate. To evict, she pays $37 to take them to small-claims court.

Earlier this year, she had to evict a tenant who hadn’t paid rent for a few months because she lost her job. “It wasn’t fun, and she (the tenant) tried to beat me up,” Balderas said. “But she’s out, and I found a better renter.”

Opportunities

Despite the downward pressure on Valley rents, the housing market’s downturn is enticing more people to become landlords or to expand their portfolio of rentals.

Landlords who can afford to buy Valley homes now, maintain them and hold on to them for several years are setting themselves up for the market’s recovery.

“Investors need to have a strategy if they want to buy rental homes now,” said Beth Jo Zeitzer, president of R.O.I. Properties. Balderas is looking for more rentals to buy but only in south Phoenix. She looks only at brick- or block-built homes that her husband can fix up.

Landlords are also seeking out people for whom renting is a good option.

“When I talk to renters who have recently lost a home to foreclosure, I usually find their mortgage was twice what I am asking in rent,” Gudmundsen said. “Unfortunately, a lot of folks are losing their homes to foreclosure. Those people need places to rent.”

www.theholmgroupaz.com

AZ Central – CityNorth’s residents like living above the stores

by Connie Cone Sexton – Oct. 12, 2009 09:36 AM
The Arizona Republic

Matt Taylor wandered over to CityNorth one day to track down a special pair of sunglasses.

He was happy to see a lot of activity as people bustled about the retail shops. And then he realized people were living at the development as well.

Gazing up from the street, he could see three stories of apartments. It wasn’t long before Taylor and his girlfriend, Georgette Banach, were settling into a two-bedroom unit with a view looking down on High Street, the main street of CityNorth, a mixed development that includes retail and commercial space just north of Loop 101 near 56th Street.

There are 99 units in The Residences on High Street. As of last week, the remaining two units available have been leased. The units were originally marketed for sale as condominiums, but as the economy soured, they became luxury rentals. There are eight floor plans: one-, two- and three-bedroom (or two bedrooms with a den) spaces, ranging from approximately 750 to more than 1,800 square feet.

The units, which originally were priced at $456,000 to more than $1 million, now rent for $1,000 to $2,800 a month.

Taylor and Banach could have opted for a unit that looks out on an internal terrace, sandwiched between the apartment complex and the garage. The view would have included the pool and outdoor fireplace lounge area, but the pair liked the idea of having a feel for city living.

During the day, they can look out the floor-to-ceiling windows or pull open the sliding glass door to step out onto their terrace to visually stretch their living room.

“It has the feel of living in New York,” said Banach, 30, who works in sales and marketing. “I love that I can just go downstairs and walk over to Kona Grill. This place has a real vibrant feel.”

Taylor, 34, is an information technology consultant and works from home. He was pleased with the upgraded kitchen, which allows him to expand his cooking skills.

But, by far, they love the open feel of the apartment. The huge windows fill their space with light during the day.

Press, a coffee shop located just down the street, is of the favorite haunts by many residents living at CityNorth. Banach and Taylor find themselves heading over their almost every day. The coffee-shop workers know them by name.

For residents David and Bryn Kosack, that’s part of the appeal. CityNorth is providing a bit of coziness in an urban area. The two own their business and run it from their apartment, which they share with 10-month-old daughter, Ella. They moved in March.

To make the two-bedroom place their own, they added touches of vibrant color. A sea of blue called Calypso colors the long living room/dining room wall. A tangy red bounces from the kitchen walls.

David, 36, likes the ease of getting to know his neighbors.

Bryn, 37, is happy that the complex has a saltwater pool. And she loves relaxing on their terrace and getting to soak in the fresh air, especially now that the days are getting nice.

“This is just a happy place to live,” she said. “I can just imagine how it will be when more businesses move in and people get to know each other even more.”

If you are looking for a home in the Desert Ridge area click here:

http://www.theholmgroupaz.com/desertRidge.htm

Or

www.theholmgroupaz.com

AZ Central – So far these developers have pulled out of Desert Ridge

Pulling out

Five developers previously pulled out of northeast Phoenix’s Desert Ridge community because of the bad economy.

They are:
• D.R. Horton Co. The home builder kept 83 of 189 acres it purchased in March 2004. The land is at the southwestern corner of Tatum Boulevard and Pinnacle Peak Road.
• Toll Brothers

 

. A luxury home builder, Toll defaulted on land it won at auction in March 2004. The 81-acre site is at the western end of Desert Ridge, at the southeastern corner of 32nd Street and Deer Valley Road.
• Rightpath Limited. The company bought 269 acres west of Tatum on the north side of Loop 101 in April 2007.
• Gray Development Group. The apartment developer bought 41 acres in May 2004, north of Desert Ridge Marketplace.
• Toll/Pulte Homes Joint Venture. The partnership bought a 503-acre parcel in August 2005. It is on the east side of 56th Street north of Deer Valley.

AZ Central – Home builder defaults on Desert Ridge site

by Michael Clancy – Sept. 29, 2009 03:51 PM
The Arizona Republic

Meritage Homes has defaulted on its Desert Ridge property, where the home builder planned to put up a 1,200-home gated community called Calasera.

The property, at the southeastern corner of 56th Street and Deer Valley Road, is 288 acres. It was the last sizable Desert Ridge parcel to be in private hands.

The company bought the land in July 2005 at an Arizona State Land Department auction for $92.2 million, a record at the time. in the Desert Ridge area. homessingle-family

The parcel is one of six left for construction of

Of the other five, four were returned to the Land Department after defaults last year, and the fifth has never come up for auction.

The default leaves only two Desert Ridge parcels that have been purchased but not developed. Both are apartment sites along the eastern side of 56th Street north of Loop 101.

Under the rules of state land sales, developers are on a seven-year payment schedule. When payments are missed, default notices go out. The notices trigger a 60-day period that gives developers time to make good on their deals. If they fail, the land reverts to the Land Department.

Meritage is in the midst of the 60-day period.

The default knocks the Land Department back five years in its plans to develop Desert Ridge, a 5,700-acre master-planned area in northeast Phoenix. The only properties purchased since 2004 that remain in developers’ hands are the two apartment parcels near 56th Street and Loop 101, and the parcel south of Loop 101 where the Sagewood retirement village and Musical Instrument Museum are being built.

www.theholmgroupaz.com

USA Today – August pending home sales rise to 2.5 yr high

Oct. 6, 2009 09:26 AM
USA Today

WASHINGTON — The volume of signed contracts to buy previously occupied homes rose for a seventh month in August as buyers rushed to take advantage of a tax credit for first-time owners that expires at the end of November.

The National Association of Realtors says its seasonally adjusted index of sales agreements rose 6.4% from July to 103.8. It was the highest since March 2007 and 12% above a year ago. Economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected the index would rise to 98.6.

NAR senior economist Lawrence Yun noted that not all contracts are turning into closed sales within an expected timeframe.

“The rise in pending home sales shows buyers are returning to the market and signing contracts, but deals are not necessarily closing because of long delays related to short sales, and issues regarding complex new appraisal rules,” he said.

Typically there is a one- to two-month lag between a contract and a done deal, so the index is a barometer of future sales.

But, new rules for home appraisals and rigid lending standards have scuttled or delayed many final sales recently.

In a related report on construction spending Thursday, the Commerce Department said private residential construction surged 4.7%, largest advance since November 1993, after 0.6% rise the prior month.


a

 

October 2009
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.