Archive for February, 2010



AZ Central – LGO founder opening spot in downtown Phoenix

by Howard Seftel – Feb. 10, 2010 09:46 AM
The Arizona Republic

The downtown Phoenix restaurant scene has been speeding down the runway for the past couple of years. Now, it looks like it may achieve lift-off.

Bob Lynn, founder and president of the wildly successful La Grande Orange restaurant group (LGO Hospitality), has just signed on to open a restaurant at the new CityScape development by the end of 2010.

It will be called LGO Public House, a 3000-square foot gastro pub featuring updated American fare, including dips, salads, fish and burgers. There will also be a substantial beverage component, with craft beers, California and Oregon wines and cocktails.

Why downtown Phoenix? Lynn says that, “Phoenix is a world-class city, and I believe in downtown.”

Why CityScape? Lynn is impressed with its “big vision” and its “great energy and vibe.” The development, which expects to eventually gather 15 restaurants in its 100,000 square feet of restaurant space, is bordered by First Street and First Avenue, between Washington and Jefferson Streets. CityScape spokesman Jay Thorne says the development pursued LGO because it fit the “exact profile for a perfect tenant” – “unique and local.”

And why a gastro pub? Lynn says it’s based on his happy childhood memories of a Chicago pub called Hogans, a place where his whole family would gather. “A stiff bourbon for Mom, a beer for Dad and food for five kids,” he fondly recalls.

He anticipates a mostly professional and business clientele for lunch at LGO Public House – CityScape has attracted several law firm tenants, and Arizona State University’s downtown campus is just a short walk away. At dinner, the target demographic is “everyone,” from pre- and post-downtown event diners to nearby residents. (The restaurant plans to stay open until 1 a.m.) After LGO Public House gets its lunch and dinner act together, Lynn says breakfast will also be part of mix.

Lynn started working in restaurants at the age of 13, and spent 25 years as a high-powered executive at Houston’s before helping to launch Postino Winecafé in 2002. (He no longer has any connection to Postino.) He quickly followed up with La Grande Orange Pizzeria, Chelsea’s Kitchen and Radio Milano, which turned once-sleepy Arcadia into a buzzing Phoenix restaurant neighborhood. And last month he added Grateful Spoon Gelato (formerly known as Arlecchino Gelateria) to the LGO stable.

The company has also made a splash in southern California, with La Grande Oranges in Pasadena and Santa Monica.

Lynn says he is in downtown Phoenix for the long haul. He dreams about turning LGO Public House into “an institution like Durant’s, but more modern.”

AZ Central – Terravita residents say solar panels ruining their view

by Beth Duckett – Feb. 10, 2010 01:28 PM
The Arizona Republic

A covered walkway at Terravita Country Club in Scottsdale has driven a wedge between the club’s board of directors and residents who argue the solar-paneled structure obstructs their mountain views.

A group of residents from the Terravita community came forward recently with a 138-signature petition opposing the structure and seeking a community referendum on the panels, which they consider an eyesore.

The walkway provides shade and a roof for a solar heating system to warm the club’s Olympic-size pool.

The country club board of directors shot down the petition, citing club bylaws that limit referendums. In a letter to opponents, board members accused petitioners of burdening the community.

Opponents had hoped to challenge the walkway with a community election that would have asked residents to modify the structure, or keep it as is, said petitioner Judy Hall.

Because the structure already is built, it would cost extra to modify or re-locate it. Hall, a winter resident of Terravita, said one option is to flatten the walkway’s roof, which is angled to capture the sun but also blocks out the mountains. The group hopes to avoid legal action, she said, which could end up costing residents in payments for club attorneys’ fees.

Terravita, the first master-planned community to be built under Scottsdale’s environmentally sensitive lands ordinance, is known for its manicured green lawns and state-of-the-art club facilities next to Black Mountain and Carefree’s boulders.

The Country Club is proud of its ongoing green initiatives, said Tim Horn, who oversees the club’s capital improvements. The solar panels – expected to begin operating this week – should save money compared to gas heating, he said.

Combined with a new pool cover, Horn said the estimated savings from the solar heating panels is $690,000 over 15 years.

“Solar projects aren’t designed to be beautiful,” said Horn, secretary of the club board of directors. “The beauty is in the engineering.”

Ralph Bianco, a 13-yearresident of Terravita, has criticized the project’s appearance and cost, which he said went over initial budget estimates of $83,000 by almost $100,000, an allegation Horn dismissed. Board Treasurer Tim Leyshock was not immediately available to comment.

“Everything is right on budget,” Horn told the Scottsdale Republic.

Bianco said they will continue to drum up support from residents in the approximately 1,380-home luxury development in the hopes that it could sway board members. He said there are hundreds of people who oppose the structure, which was laid forth at a meeting almost a year ago and adopted into the board’s 2009-10 capital improvement plan.

Bianco noted that Board President Mike McClintock, who could not be reached for comment, told the group it could gather signatures from 10 percent of the community, before the board rejected the referendum.

Horn said he is open to aesthetic changes, a decision that is ultimately up to the board.

Augustus Shaw, a Phoenix attorney who specializes in homeowners associations, said a board’s covenants, conditions and restrictions on referendums determine what is legal and what is not.

“Generally this type of referendum would not be allowed,” Shaw said.

Maura Abernethy, an attorney representing Terravita, said she was not authorized to speak about the project. But Shaw said it is often the case that residents who are unhappy with a board’s decision can only take action by removing board members.

“Owners don’t have a right necessarily to undo what the board has done through referendum,” Shaw said.

If you are looking for a home in the Terravita area click here:

http://www.theholmgroupaz.com/Terravita-golf.htm

AZ Central – Model-home opening brings close to trust land battle

by Peter Corbett – Feb. 4, 2010 04:30 PM
The Arizona Republic

When Lennar opens its Estates at Lone Mountain on Saturday, it will signal the end of a long chapter of development that involved costly state land and neighbors’ efforts to preserve it.

Lennar is opening two model homes in the gated Lone Mountain community, planned for 800 houses on 600 acres northwest of 64th Street and Lone Mountain Road. Prices range from $460,000 to $531,000 for homes of 2,900 to 3,800 square feet.

“We’re not in any hurry,” said Adam Jones, Lennar division president in Arizona. “We’ll build three to four homes per month if that’s what the market demands.”

Lennar is planning 400 homes, including 48 in the first phase.

By necessity, Miami, Fla.-based Lennar has been patient in developing the Estates at Lone Mountain. Neighbors fought long and hard to preserve the square-mile desert site, and now the battered economy could limit demand for new homes.

Lennar is in a joint venture with Pulte Homes to build Lone Mountain.

Pulte plans to start sales in April on its 390 home sites. That includes 60-foot-wide lots with homes targeted for move-up family buyers and empty nesters, Pulte spokeswoman Jacque Petroulakis said.

Land sold a decade ago

Lennar’s US Home division was the winning bidder 10 years ago for the state trust land that is now the site of the Estates at Lone Mountain. The homebuilder paid $38.5 million for 608 acres, a record price at the time for state land.

Neighbors in 2000 had already mobilized to fight development, arguing that building 800 homes was too dense in an area of 1-acre lots. They said the project would tax area roads, washes and schools.

Lone Mountain’s model homes are within sight of Cactus Shadows High School.

“I’m sorry to see the desert disappear,” said Richard Corton, a resident who used to run on the state land. “I guess there is not much we can do to stop progress.”

Opponents did slow development of Lone Mountain. A group called Save Our Sonoran appealed the state land auction and filed a federal lawsuit to block development. At issue was how construction would affect washes that cut across the land.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the case, and the developer ultimately prevailed.

Now the project is contoured to protect the washes with roughly half of the site preserved as open space, said Jones, the Lennar executive.

Much of the vegetation, including tall saguaros, has been preserved in place or replanted.

No back-to-back lots

The community is laid out so that none of the homes will be built back-to-back but will instead have open space with view fences. Lots are as large as a half-acre.

Lone Mountain is between 64th and 56th streets from Lone Mountain Road to Dove Valley Road, a mile south of Carefree Highway.

It is in Phoenix and the Cave Creek School District with a Scottsdale mailing address.

Lennar is offering four floor plans, two of them one-story layouts and all with three-car garages. Three of the plans have four bedrooms and a den, and the other has three bedrooms and a flexible room.

A 30-acre community park will feature a playground, basketball court and ramadas with picnic tables and barbecue grills.

A grand opening is planned from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday at the model homes, 5910 E. White Pine Drive. The entrance is off Lone Mountain Road at 60th Street.

CNN Money – Mortgage lenders pursue homeowners even after foreclosure

By Les Christie, staff writerFebruary 3, 2010: 8:18 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — As terrible as it is to lose your house to foreclosure, at least it’s a relief to put your biggest financial headache behind you, right?

 

Former homeowners may still be on the hook if there’s a difference between what they owed on their mortgage and what the bank could sell it for at auction. And these “deficiency judgments” are ticking time bombs that can explode years after borrowers lose their homes.

It can even happen to people who got their bank to approve them selling their home for less than it is worth.

Vanessa Corey, for example, short sold her Fredericksburg, Va., home in April 2008. She and her husband built the house in 2004, but setbacks, both personal (divorce) and professional (housing bust), made it impossible for the real estate agent to keep her home. So she negotiated the short sale and thought that was the end of it.

“My understanding was that the deficiency was negotiated away,” she said. “Then, last November, I got a letter from a lawyer telling me I owed my lender $65,000. I had to declare bankruptcy. There was no way I could pay it.”

Where the foreclosure plague is spreading

Many homeowners are now in the same boat. And not just those who took out bigger loans than they could afford or who did so called “liar loans” where they didn’t have to verify their income.

Because of falling home prices, borrowers who always paid their mortgage but who have run into unforeseen circumstances — like unemployment or a job transfer — can no longer sell their homes for what they owe. As a result, they are being forced to short sell or foreclose and are getting caught up in deficiency judgments.

“After the banks foreclose, it’s very common now to have large deficiencies with houses not worth the balances owed,” said Don Lampe, a North Carolina real estate attorney.

Lenders mostly declined comment. Although Corey’s lender, BB&T did indicate it was pursuing more deficiency judgments.

“They follow the rise and fall of foreclosures,” said the spokeswoman, who would not discuss Corey’s account.

Can they come after you?

Whether banks can and will pursue deficiency judgments depends on many factors, including what state the borrower lives in and whether there’s a second mortgage or other liens. But if borrowers ignore the possibility of deficiencies, it could haunt them.

“Once they have a judgment, they can pursue you anywhere,” said Richard Zaretsky, a board-certified real estate attorney in West Palm Beach, Fla. “They can ask for financial records, have your wages garnished and, if you fail to respond, a judge can put you in jail.”

In the case of foreclosure, lenders can pursue deficiencies in more than 30 states, including Florida, New York and Texas, according to the U.S. Foreclosure Network, an organization of mortgage law firms.

Some states, such as California, are “non-recourse” and don’t allow deficiency judgments. But, even there, if the if the original loan was refinanced, some or all of it may be subject to claims.

Check the foreclosure rate in your state

Deficiency judgments on short sales and deeds-in-lieu can happen in many more places. In these cases, extinguishing the debt is often a matter of negotiating with the bank.

But even when lenders are willing, many borrowers may not be aware that they have to ask for release. So, if you are pursuing a short sale, be sure your attorney asks the bank to release you from any further obligation.

“People shouldn’t have a false sense of security that a deficiency judgment may not be later sought,” Zaretsky said.

He expects many will be filed over the next few years, based on the fact that banks have sold many of these accounts to collection agencies and other third parties, at discount.

“The parties who bought those notes wouldn’t have paid money for them unless they had the intention of acting,” Zaretsky said.

Ticking time bomb

What can be scary is that the judgments don’t have to be obtained immediately. Lenders or collection agencies may wait until debtors have recovered financially before they swoop in. In Florida, the bank can wait up to five years to file. Once the court grants a judgment, the lender has 20 years there to collect, with interest.

It doesn’t have to be a large amount of debt for a lender or collection agency to come after borrowers. Richard Varno and his wife short sold their Nashville home back in 2004 after he lost his job.

It wasn’t until 2008, when the second lien holder asked him for $25,000, that he realized he still was liable.

“I told them, ‘Hey, you guys released the title,’” he said. “As far as I know, I’m off the hook.”

He wasn’t. Releasing title does not necessarily end the debt. It’s complicated because of variations in state law, but, generally, a mortgage has two parts: a pledge of collateral, represented by the home, and a promise to pay off the loan.

Lenders may release property liens in order to facilitate short sales without releasing borrowers from their obligations to pay under the promissory notes. The secured debt can convert to an unsecured one after the sale.

Zaretsky had one client who was so relieved to have arranged a short sale that he signed every paper his real estate agent shoved at him, even a confession that clearly stated he still owed the debt.

“He had no idea what he was doing,” said Zaretsky. “All the lender had to do was go to court to convert the confession into a deficiency judgment.”

Lenders are also very inconsistent. One of Zaretsky’s short-sale clients was ready, willing and able to pay, but the bank did not even ask; another lender always reserves the right to pursue the deficiency.

Strategic defaults

Sometimes lenders go after borrowers walking away from their homes if they have other assets, according to Florida real estate attorney Larry Tolchinsky.

“Banks are pulling credit reports to see if it’s a strategic default,” he said. “If you’re behind on all your other payments, you’re okay. But if you’re not, they’ll come after you.”

If borrowers have any doubts about their risks, they should seek legal advice. Or, at least, call non-profit organizations such as NeighborWorks for advice. According to Doug Robinson, a NeighborWorks spokesman, its counselors always try to negotiate away deficiencies when they facilitate short sales or deeds-in-lieu.

“We don’t favor any short-sale contracts that leave any deficiency that can be pursued,” he said.

Robinson himself knows what can happen. He paid off a deficiency after his own New Jersey house went through foreclosure 11 years ago. 

AZ Central – Foreclosure scams continue to menace homeowners

by Catherine Reagor – Feb. 2, 2010 05:17 PM
The Arizona Republic

Foreclosure scams that ultimately cost struggling homeowners more than a mortgage payment continue to climb in Arizona.

To combat the scams and help protect homeowners facing foreclosure, legislation has been introduced to regulate the growing number of firms offering loan modifications.

Senate Bill 1130 calls for prohibiting “foreclosure consultants” from collecting any fees until they have completed all the services they promise, with the services outlined in a signed contract. Thousands of Phoenix-area homeowners have paid home-loan modification firms upfront fees ranging from $1,000 to $4,000 and then received no help.

“Too many homeowners are just happy to have someone offer them help, so they give scam artists all their money and then receive no help and fall farther behind on their mortgage payment,” said Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, who backs the legislation.

His office recently filed a lawsuit against Phoenix-based Asset Creation and its owner, Marvin Williamson, alleging deceptive practices in offering loan modifications. According to court documents, Asset Creation charged clients upfront fees ranging from $1,680 to $3,430 for loan modification help, and advertised it could obtain a 50 percent reduction in the homeowners’ mortgage payments.

Housing advocates warn homeowners to beware of groups guaranteeing reductions in their mortgage payments through loan modifications. No one, including non-profit housing counselors, can promise a mortgage modification.

The legislation would allow Arizona prosecutors to charge foreclosure consultants “who engage in conduct that constitutes fraud or deceit against a homeowner” with a Class 1 misdemeanor charge, which comes with a fine of up to $2,500 and a jail sentence of up to six months.

Arizona homeowners can call the state’s foreclosure prevention hotline, 877-448-1211, to receive free help from non-profit housing counselors, who are exempt from this legislation

Faith-based aid

Last week, Arizona housing advocates held a forum at a Phoenix church alerting people to foreclosure scams. The event was part of a new movement to reach out to faith-based community leaders to help spread the word about loan-modification scams and where homeowners can find free help.

“People with problems often turn to their church or spiritual center first,” Mark Lipton, director of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Center for Faith Based Initiatives, told the crowd at Mountain View Lutheran Church.

“We are asking you all to tell people in your community how to avoid these foreclosure scams and where to find help.”

Information was passed out with Arizona’s foreclosure prevention hotline number and tips for homeowners to avoid the scams.

‘Walk-in’ help

Two “walk-in” clinics to help struggling homeowners are now open in Phoenix. Neighborhood Housing Services of Phoenix and Chicanos Por La Causa are partnering with government-owned mortgage giant Freddie Mac to operate what are being called Borrower Help Centers. These new centers provide free financial counseling and help negotiating a loan modification with lenders.

These walk-in centers might prove to be more accessible to some homeowners and even streamline the process for Freddie Mac borrowers, said Patricia Garcia Duarte, chief executive of Neighborhood Housing.

The Borrower Help Centers are located at 1405 E. McDowell Road and 1112 E. Washington St., Suite 102.

If you are looking to buy a foreclosure in the Scottsdale market click here:

http://www.theholmgroupaz.com/foreclosures.htm

AZ Central – Market Street adds 2 businesses

Market Street adds 2 businesses

Market Street at DC Ranch has added a new restaurant and a Krispy Kreme doughnut shop.

Beauregard Food Co. is in a corner shop across from Armitage Bistro and the doughnut shop is immediately south of the new restaurant

Dan Brinton is the owner of both businesses, which opened the week of Jan. 18.

Brinton, a Silverleaf resident, is the owner of eight Krispy Kreme shops in the Valley and hopes to have 20 statewide within a year.

Beauregard Food Co., 20825 N. Pima Road, features southern cooking.

Krispy Kreme is one of the first national brands on Market Street.

If you are looking for a home in the DC Ranch area click here:

http://www.theholmgroupaz.com/dcRanch.htm

Looking to buy a foreclosure in Scottsdale?

Looking to buy a Foreclosure or a Short Sale?

Click here to search all available foreclosures through the multiple listing system.

Click here to search foreclosures in our mapping solution.

If so, you have just discovered the best way of searching bank owned properties and short sales in Scottsdale as well as the entire Phoenix Metropolitan area.  Simply click search below and you can view properties in several different formats, including:

  • Our clients are able to view our exclusive pocket listings that are not available anywhere else but on our site.  As a registered user you will have access to exclusive properties that we represent as well as listings of other agents and lenders that are not listed on the MLS.
  • View all foreclosures through the Multiple Listing System which is updated daily
    • MLS Link:
  • View state of the art 3D Mapping Solutions of just foreclosures and short sales
    • We use both Google Earth and Microsoft Mapping
    • Viewing formats include: Aerial, Bird’s Eye, 2D and 3D
    • Mapping Link: Click here to search listings.

Our services for buyers and/or sellers include and are not limited to the following:

  • Properties Represented: Bank Owned Foreclosures,  Government Foreclosed Houses, Homes For Sale at Auction, Pre-Foreclosed Homes, Short Sales, Distressed Properties, and Commercial Foreclosures including Office as well as Golf Courses
  • Clients Represented: Investors, Lenders, Home Owners, First Time Home Buyers, FHA Home Buyers, VA Home Buyers, Vacation Home Buyers, etc.
  • Successfully negotiating a contract for foreclosures as well as short sales
  • Negotiate short sale listing conditions with the lender or lenders
  • Aggressively market your short sale via the internet,  to our existing clients, as well as our investors

Foreclosures are a tricky game and it is critical that you work with a licensed professional that knows the process to assist you through the process from start to finish otherwise you might be just wasting your time.

http://www.theholmgroupaz.com/

AZ Cental – Investors buy Century Plaza condo tower

by J. Craig Anderson – Feb. 1, 2010 01:26 PM
The Arizona Republic

The Century Plaza high-rise condominium tower’s new owners are hoping to see the award-winning but financially embattled former office building in Phoenix enjoy the success that has eluded it for nearly two years.

An investment partnership led by Canadian developer Macdonald Development Corp. said Friday that it has purchased the 17-story project for an undisclosed sum.

After opening in mid-2008, Century Plaza ran into financial trouble almost immediately.

The project’s construction lender, M&I Thunderbird Bank, had placed the property in receivership by December 2008, and developer Equus Realty LLC filed for voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in August.

Equus had sold only 14 of the 145 units, and the building’s estimated value was $19 million.

AZ Central – CityNorth decision to impact future development deals

by Michael Clancy – Feb. 1, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Development agreements between governments and private parties will still be a major part of governmental economic policy, but future agreements will have to be structured in ways that make the public benefits clear and reasonable in the wake of a recent Arizona Supreme Court decision.

Lawyers, economic-development officials and others said deals with retail developers are likely to be the most in jeopardy as a result of the court’s decision last week in the CityNorth case.

But if anyone was hoping the court would abolish all such deals, they are likely to be disappointed.

The court said such projects might be OK if agreements setting up incentives, tax breaks and subsidies do two things: spell out what the government will get in return and provide enough in return that the amount of the government investment is not way out of whack.

In the case of CityNorth, the court said, 3,180 parking spaces probably were not enough to account for Phoenix’s $97.4 million potential investment. It let the agreement stand, however, because of confusion arising from previous decisions.

Another deal attracting public scrutiny more clearly guarantees what each party brings to the table. Under the memorandum of understanding, which will be formalized when financing is arranged, the Chicago Cubs agree to buy the land for a new spring-training facility and transfer ownership to Mesa, while Mesa will build and own the stadium.

The Cubs will be responsible for stadium operations and upkeep, which had been a net expense for the city.

Mesa Mayor Scott Smith told reporters that lawyers for the city and the baseball team would need time to study the memorandum in light of the CityNorth case.

“We believe the agreement we have would satisfy the requirements,” he said.

Grady Gammage, whose firm represented CityNorth in the case, said he believes the judgment muddied the waters even further.

The court said governments could not consider “indirect benefits” when determining incentives. In the CityNorth case, it deemed indirect benefits to include the promise of jobs and tax revenue.

“These agreements are all about indirect benefits,” Gammage said. “The question is whether the investment exceeds the indirect benefits.”

Cities engage in dozens of incentive agreements, from the sale and leaseback of office buildings to repaying developers for infrastructure costs. Virtually every Valley city has a set of agreements completed, others in progress.

Clint Bolick, of the Goldwater Institute, who argued against the CityNorth incentives, said it was impossible to pass instant judgment on other such deals still in the works, adding that the details of those deals will make or break them.

In the case of CityNorth, additional guarantees from the developer, incorporated into the ordinance that approved the agreement, might have made a difference, Bolick said.

For Gammage, however, that difference is not meaningful. The CityNorth deal will not activate until the city has a steady stream of income, he said, and rewriting the agreement to obligate the developers would make no difference.

Tom Irvine, an attorney who has worked on similar agreements for government groups, said numerous past agreements would not have stood up to the court’s new, updated direction.

“Any pure retail subsidy would fail,” he said.

Some, in fact, fell apart even before any suit could be filed or any court could make a ruling, he said, citing a $36.7 million subsidy to developer Steve Ellman for a big-box-store-anchored shopping area at the old Los Arcos Mall location.

Last week’s decision, Irvine said, made clear that subsidies must have a public purpose and that what the city gets in return cannot be “outlandish.”

“If people do not try to beat the system, you can successfully negotiate economic-development agreements,” he said.

Sen. Ken Cheuvront, who was a plaintiff in the CityNorth case, said future subsidies will have to be “fine-tuned” so that governments do not “give away the house so they can build a garden.”

David Krietor, deputy city manager of Phoenix, who oversees economic development in the city, said Phoenix will continue to seek partnerships with organizations that help the city reach its goals.

“We are going to focus on projects that have a strong positive economic impact for the city of Phoenix and recommend strategic partnerships to the city council that are consistent with local, state and federal law,” he said.

Several people argued that the real problem lies in Arizona’s tax system.

As long as sales taxes dominate municipal revenue, cities will be forced to enter such agreements, they said.

“This does not happen in places with more diversified economies and a broader tax base,” Cheuvront said.

Gammage went further.

“The really frustrating thing is that other states let the government do economic development,” he said, citing New Mexico’s new incentives to build solar plants, train workers in green industries and provide tax credits and financing. “Here, it is a complete mess. Deciding this in a political manner is a more rational way to go about it.”

« Previous Page


a

 

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.